ShareThis Page

Alle-Kiski Tuesday Takes

| Monday, Dec. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

New shelter space: A New Kensington native has donated a rural, 5-acre parcel in Allegheny Township to the Animal Protectors of Allegheny Valley for a new shelter. That's great. The current shelter off of Stevenson Boulevard is far too small and the animals have little exercise space. Now the no-kill shelter has to do its part — raise $2 million for construction.

Budgets, budgets, budgets: The annual sausage-making that it takes to create a fiscal plan for our counties is well underway:

• In Westmoreland, we're hearing the same “We're so broke!” lament we've been hearing for decades. This year's deficit is an estimated $19 million. But fear not — the commissioners may whine but invariably make the cuts/find more money.

• In Allegheny, the proposed capital budget contains a $500,000 line item to help bail out the insolvent August Wilson black cultural center. But as County Councilman Michael Finnerty, D-Scott, astutely notes, that's not a capital budget function — not that the county should be bailing out the Wilson center in the first place.

• In Armstrong, the commissioners have told all departments to come in with a 10-percent budget reduction — no if, ands or buts. There is much wailing and gnashing of teeth in Kittanning.

• The Butler commissioners aren't raising taxes, but they are threatening to sell the county's money-losing nursing home, Sunnyview.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.