Share This Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Prohibition ended 80 years ago today. Pennsylvania was one of the last states to ratify the repeal, better known as the 21st Amendment. And while the ban on alcoholic beverages ended four score years ago, the Keystone State is forced to live still with an archaic state liquor monopoly. It's time for the Republican-controlled Legislature to do what the people elected it to do and expect it to do — end Prohibition once and for all. ... It was in 2007 that the BBC was warning how the Arctic would be ice free by this past summer, Thomas Lifson reminds in the American Thinker. But a funny thing happened on the way to the end of the world as we know it: The Daily Mail in England reports Arctic ice has increased by 29 percent in the last year. As Mr. Lifson reminds, “Global warming is the most expensive and widespread con job in the history of the world.” Or, put another way, the greatest social re-engineering con ever perpetrated. ... Those new professional baseball and football stadiums which some Georgia taxpayers will be molested to build will feature far more in the way of “premium” seats. That means “expensive.” And that means Joe and Jane Sixpack — their pockets turned out for their nickels, dimes, quarters and dollars — are being priced out of the sport they've so rabidly supported. Talk about shafting the ones who brought you to the game, so to speak. Taxpayers have no business underwriting the capital costs of the barons of sport.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.