Saturday essay: A special tinsel
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 6, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
The freshly trimmed Christmas tree is radiant in the soft glow of its miniature lights reflecting off the ornaments and history itself. For you see, at least five generations are represented on the fresh-cut, 8-foot Fraser fir.
There's the tattered handmade Santa from one set of great-grandparents made as the 19th century turned into the 20th.
There are classic hand-painted glass ornaments from grandparents dating to the 1930s. And from the lean war years of the '40s, there's a World War II fighter plane.
Then there are the plastic wonders of the 1950s and '60s. Among them, colored “lanterns” with feather-light aluminum blades inside that spin with the house breezes.
There's also the funny decor from the '70s and '80s — a running reindeer, a miniature six-pack of beer and Eddie's RV from “Christmas Vacation.”
And what Christmas tree would be complete without a sampling of decorations made by two daughters as the last century turned?
But there's a very special “new” old item on the tree this year — a few strands of wide tinsel dating to the 1950s. It was found just this past spring in a box of Dad's old HO model trains.
Not allowed to sparkle for more than half a century, it occupies a front-and-center place of honor, reflection and history truly rolled into one.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The IRS scandal: The gun smokes
- Hillary Clinton needs to answer for squandered aid money to Afghanistan’s corrupt war ministries
- Donor kidney discard rates: Unanswered questions
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Sunday pops
- Junk nutrition
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- The case of Beaver County Sheriff George David: He should be jailed pending trial
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies