The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that convicted former state Sen. Vince Fumo is considering running for a spot on the Democratic State Committee. While his public corruption conviction bars him from ever again seeking public office, it apparently does not apply to partisan private organizations. Should Mr. Fumo become a committeeman, we can't wait for his workshops on how to rip off public and nonprofit coffers. After all, he's a pro. ... USA Today couldn't seem to bring itself to share exactly what models of vehicles were the top sellers when it reported on November's very hot vehicle sales. For the record, sales of big Ford and Chevrolet pickups continued to lead the pack (with the Ram pickup not far behind in fourth place). USA Today, however, did report that sales of the Nissan Leaf electric and Chevy Volt electric “did well.” Uhm, they didn't even make the top 16, folks. ... The Employment Policies Institute says 500,000 fast-food workers nationwide would lose their jobs if the government forced up the minimum wage to the $15 an hour being demanded by their union proxies. Yet another example of regressive “progressive” policies. ... Pittsburgh's leftist Thomas Merton Center will hold a “holiday party and open house” on Saturday. It will feature “an activist sing along.” Expect such classic carols as “We Three Kings of Orient Are (Going on Strike Until Our Union is Recognized)” and “The Little Drummer Boy (Deserves A Living Wage Even Though He's a Stop-Action Animation Figure).” Ahem.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.