TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

'Merit selection' for judges? No thank you

Daily Photo Galleries

Monday, Dec. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

“Merit selection” legislation that would diminish judicial accountability to voters and enshrine in law attorneys' influence over who becomes a Pennsylvania appellate judge lacks genuine merit.

State Reps. Bryan Cutler, R-Peach Bottom, and Brian Sims, D-Philadelphia, propose merit selection for Commonwealth, Superior and Supreme court judges, which requires a constitutional amendment. They'd be chosen by the governor from a list provided by a bipartisan, 15-member nominating commission, then confirmed by the Senate.

Nominating commission members would be appointed by politicians — the governor (six), the House and Senate majority and minority leaders (eight) and the attorney general (one) — so politics would remain part of the process. And with some nominating commission members having to be lawyers, merit selection — advocated as an antidote to lawyers' influence in judicial elections — ironically would codify their influence.

The constitutional amendment would require passage in two consecutive legislative sessions, then approval in a voter referendum. So, voters are too dumb to choose judges themselves — but not to vote away their right to do so?

“The way you have checks and balances is at the ballot box,” says veteran state Rep. Tom Caltagirone, D-Reading, about the real merits of voters electing judges. He's minority chairman of the House Judiciary Committee — where this merit-selection bill must die, for the sake of transparency, judicial accountability and voters' rights.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. U.N. Watch: Gun-grabbers unite!
  2. For the Pennsylvania House: Ortitay, Krieger and Logan
  3. Early voting: Hardly healthy
  4. Philly’s schools: The real injustice
  5. The Paycheck Fairness Act: It’s not needed
  6. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  7. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  8. The Penguins’ TIF
  9. Mass shootings: Cooked numbers
  10. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  11. McCaffery’s emails: Legitimate ‘prying’
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.