ShareThis Page

The Monsour monstrosity

| Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Westmoreland County will step up and secure the festering mess that is the dilapidated Monsour Medical Center in Jeannette. Credit the full, unforgivable expense, when it's all tabulated, to eight years of inexcusable inaction by state and local officials.

Confidential patient files that were supposed to be secured or destroyed when the hospital closed in 2006 now litter its hallways. And the building itself, along busy Route 30, has deteriorated into a public safety threat.

So the county is moving ahead with plans to destroy the patient files. Then the Westmoreland County Industrial Development Corp. is planning to build a fence around the ramshackle building.

And who's held accountable? Nobody, officials say, because the now-defunct corporation that owns the site, Monsour Medical Center Inc., lists no individual owners.

That's the Monsour “legacy,” and it demands a top-down state review so that it never happens again with another closed hospital.

For starters, state hospital regulators should have demanded the proper disposal of those medical files when they shut down Monsour after the hospital flunked a series of state inspections.

And state and/or local officials should have ensured that the hospital was properly secured when it closed — not almost eight years later.

What stands today is a towering insult to the public interest simply because nobody bothered to address the mess left behind when the hospital's administration simply turned off the lights and walked away.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.