A PLCB Christmas: It's no bargain
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 13, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Christmastime is a bargain hunter's delight as retailers of all types and sizes offer sales and, in many cases, some exceptional deals. That is, except for the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board at its government-run, Prohibition-era liquor stores.
Oh, the PLCB gets into the holiday spirit — sort of. On Cyber Monday, for instance, the state booze board offered free shipping for online purchases. Not to your home but to the state liquor store of your choice, reports Dawn Meling for the Commonwealth Foundation.
Then there's the PLCB's Holiday Gift Guide, which recommends what alcohol is most suitable for the “trendsetter” or the “business associate,” Ms. Meling writes. Surely this advice syncs with the PLCB's dual responsibilities of education and enforcement of responsible drinking, right?
In stark contrast are Washington state's year-old privatized liquor stores, which actually compete for sales to the benefit of their customers. According to published reports, those stores are “pulling out all the stops” to extend customer service.
Pennsylvania's liquor stores don't pull out so much as a wine cork.
“No matter how they mask it, the PLCB can't serve consumer needs like the private sector can,” notes Ms. Meling.
Perhaps next year at this time, if state lawmakers get off the dime, a different seasonal spirit will prevail at Pennsylvania's liquor stores: the power of the free market.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- Junk nutrition
- The big sting: To what end?
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances