Greensburg Tuesday takes
Jeannette's fiscal follies: Too often, especially around budget time, we hear overly optimistic forecasts of the distressed city's finances. This year, however, a bank's rejection of the city's plan to refinance a 1998 bond issue puts Jeannette's fiscal plight in clear perspective. Here's hoping this wake-up call leads somewhere. Read on.
A positive sign: Whether it was “politics,” as one official suggests, or something else, Jeannette City Council did the right thing by deferring salary hikes for five city administrators until the new mayor, Richard Jacobelli, begins his term next month. Besides, given the financial issues facing Jeannette, not the least of which is the sorry state of the city's employee pensions, any talk of raises should be shoved to a far back burner.
Pathetic plight: For parents with children in schools that failed to meet the latest academic benchmark set by Pennsylvania's Department of Education, recent statewide assessments (released after a two-month delay) aren't “mixed.” Thirty-four schools in Westmoreland and Fayette counties missed the mark. And sadly, parents of limited means have precious few options, besides charter schools, in providing a proper education for their children. The latest assessment of Pennsylvania's public schools reinforces the argument for more school choice.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Canary in a coal mine’: The SSDI dilemma
- Confidentiality & carnage: Something has to give
- Voter ID: A case reaffirmed
- Work’s the thing
- Saturday essay: Anatomy of a backache
- A school choice victory: Follow the child
- Mon-Yough Tuesday takes
- Orphan sinkhole
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- ‘No man, no problem’