Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Dec. 26, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
On the “Watch List”:
• Local development. Billions of dollars in big-ticket projects are being touted in 2014 as an indication of a broad economic uptick for the region. And while such projects are indeed, in general, encouraging, the question too easily forgotten is this: How many of these projects attempt to turn taxpayers into venture capitalists?
• The latest PNC settlement. The Pittsburgh banking giant is paying $35 million to settle charges of racial bias in lending at the former National City Bank, which it took over a few years back, thanks to public money (since repaid). No good deed goes unpunished in the wacky world of government interventionism.
• The Peduto administration. A new era dawns next week with the inauguration of Bill Peduto as Pittsburgh's next mayor. The Democrat has promised an inclusive administration with the very worthy goal of refocusing efforts to revitalize the city's neighborhoods. Mr. Peduto is hitting the ground running and that's a very good sign.
•The Steelers. At 7-8, Pittsburgh remains a long shot to make the playoffs as a wild card. But a combination of a win at home Sunday against the Browns and losses by Miami, Baltimore and San Diego would send the Black and Gold into the post-season as a wild card. Stranger things have happened. But not much more strange.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Junk nutrition
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- The big sting: To what end?
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics