TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

ObamaCare: Misleading 'guides'

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Friday, Dec. 27, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
 

As if consumers didn't have enough worries about providing their personal information to receive ObamaCare coverage, now comes news that some of their “guides” through this maze of government bureaucracy may be ill prepared — or far worse — in their advice.

A House Oversight and Government Reform Committee report found that ObamaCare's so-called “navigators” are improperly trained, gave clients wrong information and, in some cases, encouraged people to commit fraud.

These findings come not from any internal ObamaCare oversight — ineffectual as it is — but from news accounts.

For example, a video shows navigators from the Urban League in Dallas advising applicants to lie on their applications to qualify for tax subsidies, Breitbart reports. In some cases, consumers allegedly are told to low-ball their income to receive more subsidies.

Did we mention that these public assistants responsible for handling reams of sensitive personal information do not, according to the report, undergo mandatory background checks?

“(D)ocuments call into question the effectiveness of the Navigator program and the Obama administration's ability to safeguard consumer information,” the report states.

Americans cannot safely navigate the uncertainties of ObamaCare if they can't at least trust their navigators. And they shouldn't be forced to do so, herded like lambs to the slaughter.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  2. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  3. Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
  4. Merging health insurers: Suffering ahead?
  5. Regional growth
  6. North Korea’s nukes: Object lesson ignored
  7. Kittanning Laurels & Lances
  8. The Brady affair: Contract law
  9. EPA diktats: Pushing back