By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Dec. 31, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Ah, the new year has arrived. Out with the old and in with new and all that — save the usual pickthanks and pickpockets. Here's just a small sampling:
• Gasoline and diesel fuel taxes begin a five-year climb up the ladder today in Pennsylvania. Come 2018, you'll be paying more than 26 cents per gallon more for gasoline and nearly 36 cents more per gallon for diesel fuel.
Proponents of feeding the commonwealth's out-of-control government-transportation complex insist that the filching will be virtually painless. After all, they say, producers won't pass on much of the increase, choosing instead to reduce their profits. And we have a waterfall to sell you in the Sahara Desert.
• And fuel taxes could be even higher if a pair of federal bills proposed by Rep. Earl Blumenauer have any legs.
As a reward for driving more fuel-efficient vehicles and driving fewer miles — which has reduced what Uncle Sam collects from the 18.4 cents-per-gallon tax on gasoline — the Oregon Democrat wants to nearly double the tax to 33.4 cents a gallon over the next three years. But considering it would be indexed for inflation, the federal gasoline tax would rise in perpetuity. A second bill would tax motorists per mile driven.
Of course, no one talks about the profound effect such a hike would have on commerce — less of it at a higher price.
• Oh, and let's not forget the latest round of fare hikes on the Pennsylvania Turnpike (to end all fare hikes, until next year).
So, welcome to 2014. If you can afford it, that is.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- THE BOX
- Sunday pops
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- Another EPA crock: Sulfur silliness