ShareThis Page

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

Laurel: To Jeannette's spirit. Despite challenges facing the city, not the least of which are crime and violence, about 150 people turned out at a rally this week to “take back” Jeannette. Their pride and can-do spirit are the most valuable resources the cash-strapped city has to turn itself around.

Lance: To Jeannette's status quo. Mayor Richard Jacobelli wasn't even sworn in before a controversy erupted over an estimated $1,000 in renovations for his office. Regardless of the cost (Mr. Jacobelli said he'll pay if it becomes an issue) or the “principle,” Jeannette's leaders have much bigger fiscal problems to resolve.

Laurel: To Jim Smith. The former Southwest Greensburg Council president, borough fire department ex-president, former board member with the Greensburg Hempfield Area Library and Greater Greensburg Sewage Authority, among other involvements, is retiring from council after 28 years. Mr. Smith, 83, says he believes community service is his duty. Sadly, his level of service is the exception these days.

On the “Watch List”: Unity's supervisor-roadmasters. Newly seated Supervisor Tom Ulishney, who campaigned against taking a full-time roadmaster position, reportedly will fill in during emergencies, which still leaves the township with a hole in its roadmaster schedule. What better time to re-evaluate the antiquated supervisor-roadmaster role, properly separating those responsibilities and bringing Unity into the 21 century.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.