TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The Max Baucus conflict: It's too serious to confirm him as U.S. ambassador to China

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Saturday, Jan. 11, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

Just whose interests would Sen. Max Baucus represent as U.S. ambassador in Beijing — America's or China's?

President Obama last month nominated the Montana Democrat, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, as America's next ambassador to China despite a troubling backstory. What's truly worrisome is Baucus' advising the nonprofit U.S.-China Policy Foundation.

U.S. subsidiaries of state-owned Chinese banks and companies have funded annual foundation galas. Among them is Huawei Technologies, which poses a national security risk, according to a 2012 report by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It cited the ability of the company's telecommunications equipment to send sensitive data to China if it's installed by U.S. companies.

An unnamed China expert links the policy foundation with a “new pro-China lobby” that functions as “an echo chamber for Beijing's interests,” The Washington Free Beacon reports. That lobby is currying favor with the U.S. business community, which wants easier access to Chinese markets and presses Congress to favor China.

The conflict of interest Baucus would have as U.S. ambassador to hostile, Communist-ruled China is blatant enough that he shouldn't have been nominated. It's so blatant that he shouldn't be confirmed.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. The Export-Import Bank: The Senate’s shame
  2. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  3. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  4. Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
  5. At the VA: The waiting dead
  6. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  7. U.N. Watch: The ‘race’ is on
  8. Council fails again: Shoot straight, Ford City
  9. The Keystone XL pipeline: No surrender
  10. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  11. The Thursday wrap