Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Parking success: The Pittsburgh Parking Authority says those new meter-replacing solar-powered payment kiosks are paying off. Daily parking revenues have more than doubled, it says. And unlike the old coin meters, in which parkers paid for a particular space, time paid for a kiosk is transferable to other parking spots. The biggest rap against the kiosks has been that they're confusing. But time and greater familiarity should solve that problem.
Bugler illogic: The Toledo, Ohio, Block Bugler argues for a blanket ban on firearms at all Pennsylvania state-owned universities. It dismisses as a “myth” the concept of “armed resistance” and says “victims of the crimes that do occur (on campuses) could be put at additional risk if criminals committing them have the benefit of freely carrying deadly weapons.” But gun-toting criminals are going to carry guns no matter what. And the only “additional risk” is victims, by order of the state, being turned into quivering sitting ducks.
Doo-dah, Doo-dah: Songwriter Stephen Foster inspired composers and musicians, from Al Jolson and Irving Berlin to Tommy Dorsey and Ray Charles. And some still might not know he's a Pittsburgher. Aficionados gathered Monday at Mr. Foster's grave in Allegheny Cemetery to commemorate the 150th anniversary of his death. Responsible for such tunes as “Oh! Susanna,” “Camptown Races,” “Hard Times Come Again No More” and “Beautiful Dreamer,” Foster was Americana. And he still is.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.