Saturday essay: The garden eclectic
The new garden is beginning to take shape. At least in the mind.
It won't be long before the greenhouse gets its annual scrubbing; whether the long-in-the-tooth roof of marine vinyl is replaced with more sturdy polycarbonate panels remains to be seen. But if the long-range forecast is accurate, there won't be much else activity there until true spring arrives; March is expected to be much colder than usual this year.
That, however, should free up time to rethink the adjacent raised beds.
The tomatoes, handicapped by last year's early blight, will get a new home — a larger, sunnier bed on a terrace just below the greenhouse. And that will free up some major real estate.
Peppers, grown only in the greenhouse the past several years, likely will be the greatest beneficiary. But expanded plots of green beans and cucumbers won't be far behind. And the cabbage will be able to stretch its legs a bit more.
As for that newly free space in the greenhouse, perhaps it's time to think outside the box. An ornamental banana tree would make a singular statement. But Mexican watermelon gherkins or Malaysian yard-long snake beans certainly could be conversation starters. Then again, a nice large tub of mixed flowers would please pollinators and plants alike.
The possibilities, of course, are endless. After all, if you can't make your garden an experience in horticultural eclecticism, why bother?
— Colin McNickle
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Expanding Medicaid: Gov.-elect Wolf embraces a false premise
- U.N. Watch: Another jaded ‘inquiry’
- The revolving door: Washington’s ‘gift’
- Sunday pops
- The regulatory state: EPA picks a fight
- The Eric Garner case: Blame the police state
- The Thursday wrap
- The Box
- The Kane chronicles: Meaningless moves
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Holiday Gift Club: The spirit of the season