Health care headaches: Making a difference
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Jan. 24, 2014, 8:57 p.m.
Dr. Peter Sotos has been doing his part to make health care accessible to people who are uninsured or underinsured since mid-December at his practice in the Medical Arts Building in East Franklin. He has opened his doors to walk-in traffic and is offering a discount to those who pay in cash.
He and his wife, Kristina, who doubles as office manager at the practice, said they were motivated to offer the new services because they saw dwindling numbers of people seeking medical care at area hospitals and doctors' offices — ostensibly because they couldn't afford to pay for it.
The problem could be rising insurance premiums that are making policies unobtainable for many people. Or it could be high deductibles that make insurance affordable, but only practical in the case of catastrophic illness. It takes a lot of office visits with a runny nose before a $1,000 or more deductible is reached. That's cash out of the pocket. And it is cash many people don't have.
The Sotos called it a travesty that economics are moving people to forgo needed medical care. It's hard to disagree.
It is too early to judge what kind of impact something as simple as offering a cash discount and walk-in hours at one doctor's office will have. But it's commendable that the doctor and his wife are trying to help ease what they recognized as a significant and growing health care issue in Armstrong County.
Right now it is only one doctor's office trying to make a difference. But it's a good start.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass