ShareThis Page

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Jan. 23, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

On the “Watch List”:

• Cuts to Jeannette's on-call firefighters. The suggestion from Mayor Richard Jacobelli to slash nearly half the city's on-call firefighters, whose services totaled $55,000 in 2012, rightfully should draw attention for its public safety implications. On the other hand, it's one of the few suggestions in recent years that address the city's abysmal fiscal condition. And a fix has to begin somewhere.

• Future Latrobe-Unity recreation fee hikes. That's one scenario next year since Unity has opted not to renew its participation in the Latrobe-Unity Parks and Recreation Commission as of 2015. Before Unity cuts its ties to what's supposed to a “cooperative” initiative, it should take one more stab at a deal that's agreeable to all.

• The Pittsburgh Healthworx bust. The charges are serious: A chiropractor and two doctors at the Rostraver clinic are accused of illegally peddling pain prescriptions to addicts while collecting more than $2.3 million from Highmark. Even more disturbing is the question of whether other licensed “clinics” are dealing dope and contributing to the area's rapidly rising prescription drug overdoses and deaths.

An observation: It's one thing for Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held to suggest “backup” assistance to Jeannette police. It's quite another to first ensure that his department has clear “police power” to do so — which is in question — and to broach the idea with Jeannette officials before going public.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.