Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, Feb. 3, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Loosey-goosey: The Peduto administration keeps finding ugly reminders of past nonfeasance. First there was the mess with parking passes. Now comes word that the City of Pittsburgh doesn't have a policy regarding take-home vehicles. Good grief. But it soon will. And it's about time.

Rocco's rest: Greater Pittsburgh will pay its final respects to Officer Rocco on Friday. The canine officer who died in the line of duty last week will be remembered in a service at Soldiers & Sailors Memorial Hall in Oakland. Rocco, an 8-year-old German shepherd, died of complications from stab wounds he received apprehending a suspect in a Lawrenceville basement. The public service will be befitting of the hero Rocco was.

It's not rocket science: Once upon a time, it was common sense that those with a cold or the flu didn't visit hospital patients. And the reasoning was clear — nobody wanted the sick to become sicker. Nonetheless, UPMC was forced to issue a statement reminding flu sufferers to keep their bugs to themselves. While it's a timely admonition, it's a sad commentary on the times that it had to be made in the first place.

No! No! No!: Now that the groundhog has spoken — six more weeks of winter — and that Mother Nature appears to be affirming his prognostication with more snow, it's time to smack a growing problem hard: those who shovel or blow snow from their sidewalks and driveways into the streets. The practice creates a hazard and, yes, a legal liability should that snow lead to an accident.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.