As the Obama administration relentlessly bangs the drum for ObamaCare sign-ups, enrollees continue to be beaten up without mercy or appeal.
Within the patched-up mess that the government calls a website, tens of thousands of enrollees are finding that they can't fix errors that government workers made when they signed up, The Washington Post reports. Enrollees are being told that HealthCare.gov's computer system won't allow federal workers to access and change enrollment records.
Say, for example, some people find out that they're paying too much for the insurance they wanted. They're being told to pay now and appeal later, The Post reports.
Oh, they can appeal by mail and fill out a seven-page form. But the part of the computer system that would process claims is not yet built, officials say.
Authorities speaking on the condition of anonymity also tell The Post that they don't know when the appeals process will be addressed as there are other “priorities,” such as fixing the electronic system that pays insurers and adjusting individuals' coverage when their circumstances change.
If the government cannot fashion a functioning website after three years, how can it conceivably manage one-sixth of the U.S. economy through its health care takeover?
There's only one answer: As with a runaway train endangering all aboard, ObamaCare first must be stopped.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The regulatory state: EPA picks a fight
- Saturday essay: A manger’s light
- Holiday Gift Club: The spirit of the season
- A case study for school choice
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Ford City’s solution: Good side to cop cuts
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- The Kathleen Kane chronicles: New and serious questions are being raised about the Pa. attorney general
- Obama’s Cuba deal: More appeasement