Share This Page

Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes

| Monday, Feb. 10, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

An observation: The New Kensington-Arnold School Board is poised to approve a new student dress code to address past problems with kids wearing all manner of inappropriate clothes. But is this about appropriate clothing choices — which the district can otherwise ban by specifying which clothes are out — or is it about expanding the board's/administration's control? Parents shouldn't be too quick to relinquish their authority over their children's clothing choices.

Old and overdosing: The worry used to be about teens and 20-somethings abusing heroin and other painkillers. That is so 2005. Now a report from Westmoreland County about the number of overdose deaths shows 70 percent of those who died were between ages 40 and 70. Sadly, many of these folks became addicted after sustaining an injury and being prescribed pain medication. When the scripts run out, they turn to inexpensive street heroin.

The Gallagher era: A criticism of Patrick Gallagher as the University of Pittsburgh's chancellor-in-waiting has been his lack of fundraising experience. But in picking a leader with extensive business and science experience — where the same interpersonal skills necessary for successful fundraising are employed — Pitt's trustees appear to be acknowledging that the job is far more than just being a glorified schmoozer. The acting deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce and director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gallagher takes over Pitt on Aug. 1. We wish him every success.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.