Our Lincolnian fight
On this date in 1809, Abraham Lincoln was born in Hodgenville, Ky. Once upon a time, Americans commemorated his birthday and that of George Washington (on Feb. 22) separately. Surely men of such stature deserved the distinction instead of the conglomeration that is Monday next's Presidents Day, a three-day federal holiday better known for store sales than presidents.
All presidential tenures are not equal, of course. But that they are has become the mindset of our everybody's-a-winner society.
Alas, and not to that end, we commend for your review, on what would have been Mr. Lincoln's 205th birthday, some words to ponder, from an Aug. 22, 1864, speech to the 166th Ohio Regiment as America remained in the throes of a great civil war:
“I happen temporarily to occupy this big White House. I am a living witness that any one of your children may look to come here as my father's child has. It is in order that each of you may have through this free government which we have enjoyed, an open field and a fair chance for your industry, enterprise and intelligence; that you may all have equal privileges in the race of life, with all its desirable human aspirations. It is for this the struggle should be maintained, that we may not lose our birthright — not only for one, but for two or three years. The nation is worth fighting for, to secure such an inestimable jewel.”
Sadly, the American jewel is tarnished these days. May the fight continue. And may our struggles polish the jewel anew.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The atom smasher
- Open records: Hold the phone?
- The Arneson firing: Legally dubious
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- A hunting question: A Pennsylvania proposal to limit the game that mentored youth hunters can take appears to be a solution in search of a problem
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Snow shovelers needed: A call for volunteers
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Public pension ‘ka-boom’