Lance: To Tuesday's “snow day.” More than a few local school districts were quite quick to pull the closure trigger when a squall moved through Greater Pittsburgh as dawn broke. But the snowfall was short lived and roads were pretty much clear in short order. Sacrificing an entire day when a short delay would have sufficed defies reason. After all, this is Pittsburgh, not Atlanta.
Laurel: To Bill Peduto. For a self-described “progressive,” Pittsburgh's mayor sure is showing a welcome libertarian streak with his unwavering promotion of truly competitive taxi service. “Let me be clear about this: Competition in anything is good,” he says. “It creates a better product.” That's great to hear, Mr. Mayor. Can competitive contracting for garbage collection be far behind?
Lance: To Nate Harper. His attorneys are arguing for probation when the former Pittsburgh police chief is sentenced Tuesday for conspiring to steal money and failing to file income taxes. They cite his many years of service and claim, despite the testimony of others, that he was not the conspiracy's mastermind. But given the gross violation of the public trust, Mr. Harper should be sentenced to prison.
Laurel: To Lauryn Williams. The Rochester woman has become the first American woman and only the fifth athlete to win medals in both the summer and winter Olympics. The Beaver County star was part of the two-person team that picked up a silver medal this week in the bobsledding competition in Sochi, Russia. Our heartiest congratulations.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.