TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Call tower simulators: Liberty vs. security

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, Feb. 18, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

The Founders and Framers prized liberty over security. But that balance is tougher to maintain when technology outpaces the law. And that's the case with the FBI's use of “cell tower simulators” that can intercept all cellphone traffic in a neighborhood.

A Trib investigation found such devices have intercepted untold numbers of innocent Pittsburghers' calls, along with those of criminal suspects. An FBI spokesman defends this technology's use as “a vital component of law enforcement investigations” that could be harmed by public discussion of details.

The feds extensively redacted nearly 5,000 related documents obtained by the Trib and will say little else. Their stance is essentially “trust us.” Yet the FBI's legal basis for charging ahead with this technology is rooted in land-line wiretaps.

The Supreme Court has yet to rule on a cell tower simulator case. Congress hasn't passed rules for these devices. And FBI secrecy — from what's done with gathered data, to coaching agents on testifying about this technology without divulging details, to no-bid contracts and other methods that obscure how it's acquired and what it costs — invites scrutiny and frustrates debate.

For the law to catch up with this technology, as it must, informed debate must occur among Congress, courts and the public. And, yes, new rules must be set that adequately protect security. But like the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches — which hasn't changed — those rules must place paramount importance on liberty.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Let us resolve ...
  2. Quote for the 4th
  3. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  4. Laurels & Lances
  5. McKeesport Tuesday Takes
  6. The overtime proposal: Regressive economics
  7. The Thursday wrap
  8. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  9. Brewster advances
  10. Beware of fireworks
  11. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances