| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Pittsburgh's land-banking idea requires better vetting

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, Feb. 18, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

The Peduto administration and Pittsburgh City Council supporters tout the promise of their proposed city land bank. But serious concerns remain that must be resolved, thoroughly and publicly.

The land bank would duplicate much of what the Urban Redevelopment Authority already can do to get vacant, abandoned and tax-delinquent properties into new hands, redeveloped and back on the tax rolls, albeit with expedited title and bidding processes. Developer Aaron Chaney of Murrysville questions the need for “this extra layer of bureaucracy” and is concerned about the land bank's seven-member board playing favorites. He urges there be clear criteria and limited time for such property sales.

Two of the board's four mayoral and three council appointees would be from housing or community development groups. Bonnie Young Laing of the Hill District Consensus Group wants even more board seats for them.

Councilman Ricky Burgess perhaps went overboard in calling the land bank a city “land grab.” Time will tell. But his call for council oversight highlights another concern: the land bank's accountability to taxpayers — especially with an unelected board.

As we've previously editorialized, the land bank sounds good on its face. But the aforementioned issues must weigh heavily in any final decisions. Hopefully, City Council's public hearing this week (Thursday at 6 p.m.) will properly address them.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  2. The Wolf agenda: Coddling unions
  3. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  4. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  5. The Wolf budget: Taxing & spending
  6. SCI Greensburg: A dubious deal
  7. The Obamanet: An Internet threat
  8. The IRS scandal: A cover-up grows
  9. The Thursday wrap
  10. Saturday essay: Spring’s window
  11. U.N. Watch: Russian buffing