On the “Watch List”:
• The Missing Stuff Caper. Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto has called on the FBI to investigate items that turned up missing from his office in the transition from the Luke Ravenstahl administration, including glassware and pottery. An attorney for the former mayor balks at the suggestion of any impropriety. And unless any of these items were transported across state lines for immoral purposes (ahem), one has to wonder if requesting FBI assistance is overkill.
• Winter. March is expected to roar in like a snow-covered lion this weekend. Patience, folks; the calendar really is on spring's side.
Laurel: To Bill Peduto. He has followed through on his promise to crack down on freebie parking. Under the Ravenstahl administration, 271 passes flooded the city. But this week, Mr. Peduto cut the number to 29. And of those, only 11 will be unrestricted. All will be subject to stricter oversight. It's a smart move, financially and politically.
Lance: To the PUC. By golly, says the state Public Utility Commission, we simply can't have folks out there offering people innovative ride-sharing services to get from here to there without some kind of regulation. PUC boss Robert Powelson says his agency has a responsibility to ensure that services such as Lyft and Uber operate under the same standards as taxi companies. (What, lousy service?) Extrapolate Mr. Powelson's illogic to, say, a bread-sharing service, and you'll fully understand Big Government's hubris.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.