“Suicide by jellyfish,” “injured during the forced landing of your spacecraft,” “sucked into the engine of an airplane” and “horse-drawn carriage collided with a trolley” are among categories for new codes physicians will be required to use beginning Oct. 1 to comply with federal rules to meet new World Health Organization guidelines, reports The Weekly Standard. It says the number of codes will expand from 17,000 to 155,000. Does anyone still wonder why “health care” is out of control? ... In New Republic magazine, Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, predicts that ObamaCare will bring about the death of private insurance companies. Far from bemoaning the development, he cheers it, saying “you won't have insurance companies to kick you around anymore.” Who can doubt that this isn't the true goal of ObamaCare? And how many Americans will die — yes, we said die — because Barack Obama and the Dimmycrats ignorantly believe government knows best? ... Georgia could become the first state to pass a measure calling for a Convention of States, better known as a constitutional convention, as prescribed in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. Such a convention can't be held until 34 states agree. But if you think the day-to-day machinations of Congress are bad, those in a constitutional convention could set a new standard. While the idea of a constitutional convention is great in theory, oh, be careful for what you wish and make sure you keep your powder dry.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.