Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, March 10, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

The Manor question: Westmoreland's commissioners for now have nixed consideration of leasing the county-owned Westmoreland Manor nursing home and are looking for a management company. But the door remains open to either lease or sell the facility, we're told. Given the Manor's losses — when last we checked it was reportedly operating with a $1.3 million deficit — commissioners need to get the home's operational costs in line before this county “resource” grows into a larger liability.

Mopping up: There may be no sum of money that will fully “repair” all that's been affected by a 12,000-gallon gasoline spill in Murrysville in 2008. Reportedly an improperly installed valve in a pipeline blew out, shooting fuel 30 feet into the air, coating buildings and saturating soil. But the $2.3 million in civil penalties sought by the state against Sunoco, apart from what the company already has paid since the spill, sends a clear message: For every ounce of fuel transported, a pound of safety precaution is required.

Got water?: A 12-inch waterline break in Export last week may be a harbinger of things to come as the area emerges from winter's deep freeze. Fortunately this disruption affected only about 100 customers, according to the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County. The question is, how well will the rest of the waterworks' infrastructure hold up? Here's hoping for an uneventful thaw.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.