Highlands Hospital: Treatment & support
Connellsville's Highlands Hospital faced many challenges in 2013. With a slight drop in emergency room visits and admissions, the hospital reported $3.1 million in uncompensated and free-care costs.
Indeed, 2014 may be just as challenging.
But unlike many smaller communities, Connellsville is lucky to have a community hospital. And Highlands Hospital is a vital part of this community.
This important resource deserves the public's support.
The hospital has come a long way in more than 20 years when, under state control, its future was in doubt. More than two decades ago the former Connellsville State General Hospital was struggling to survive. In fact, the commonwealth was considering a plan to close the facility.
But local leaders and residents saw potential and value in the old hospital.
Over the years, the hospital's management has gone down many roads. But the hospital has always survived. Today, Highlands is a major employer in the city and in Fayette County.
Our community is lucky to be the home for a local hospital. And our lives are better because of Highlands, which provides basic health services and much more.
Dedicated people — physicians, nurses, technicians, support personnel and board members — are working to make Highlands Hospital a competitive health-care facility. They need residents' continued support to maintain Connellsville's medical treasure.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Thursday wrap
- State of surveillanc: The DEA database
- Open records: Hold the phone?
- The atom smasher
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Those new methane rules: More eco-extremism
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches