Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, March 10, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Downtown discouragement: Parking tickets issued Sunday in the block in front of the August Wilson Center generated complaints because signs there ban parking from “7 a.m.-7 p.m. except Sunday.” A Zone 2 officer wrote the tickets, yet a Zone 2 sergeant says the signs mean drivers can park there during those hours on Sundays. The ToonSeum's Joe Wos says the ticketing officer told him the opposite — and that the ticketing was ordered by Mayor Bill Peduto's office, which Mr. Peduto's spokesman denies. If erroneous, these tickets should be dismissed. But the bigger issue is whose signals got crossed and how, giving folks another reason to avoid Downtown.

Who's watching: At a time of controversy over electronic monitoring by government, the role of video drawn from businesses' private surveillance cameras by police who charged Allen Wade, 43, in the East Liberty killings of sisters Susan and Sarah Wolfe should give pause. A detective saying Pittsburgh police usage of video doubles annually is a further reminder that liberty and security must be balanced properly not just in Washington, but in our neighborhoods.

Panther prospects: Last-second drama finally went Pitt's way on Saturday. A buzzer-beating tying basket led to an 83-78 overtime win at Clemson. That helped, but the Panthers remain “on the bubble” for the NCAA Tournament. They can solidify an NCAA berth by winning their first ACC Tournament game on Thursday — which would hearten Pitt fans accustomed to postseason disappointment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.