Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
On the “Watch List”:
• The Highlands School Board. The board's wise decision to publish its list of delinquent taxpayers is paying dividends. The district expects to collect more than $1 million — that's more than 1 mill of property tax generates. So will the board cut taxes and return some money to the people who have been propping up the district for those who didn't pay?
• The Springdale Council. It appears council is looking to play nice with the new police chief, the mayor and each other. We hope so. Perhaps the members have figured out how petty and foolish they've looked in recent months. The chief was brought in to clean up your cesspool of a police department; give him a chance to do it.
• Prospect Cemetery. The future of the historic cemetery in Brackenridge will likely be up to an Allegheny County judge, but the biblical Solomon probably couldn't come up with a solution here. Putting the cemetery's maintenance on the borough might be a good idea, except the 1923 state law governing this limits municipal spending to $30 per year per cemetery. That's only about $16,000 less than needed.
• Pennsylvania Municipal Services. On the same day landlords in New Kensington sued the city Sanitary Authority over PAMS' heavy-handed — and allegedly illegal — collection methods, the Arnold Council heard the same complaints from its residents.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.