| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Defending the indefensible: More stimulus garbage

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Thursday, March 13, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

As if beating a horse long dead makes any sense, President Obama's politically pandering Council of Economic Advisers is still defending the indefensible by insisting that the $763 billion stimulus, five years ago, delivered the U.S. economy from depression.

Not only is this pure spin, it's dangerous because it provides an excuse for this or future administrations to attempt the same logic-stunted mistake. And that has a debilitating cost — namely, an economy that last year grew at an anemic 1.9 percent during what's been the most painfully slow recovery since World War II.

But the salesmen of the stale stimulus insist that for every dollar government increased spending, the economy grew by more than that buck because of the so-called “multiplier effect”: that dollar magically grew into a larger sum as it was passed along. What the savants of government spending neglect to point out in their tin-to-gold economic alchemy is that to give away all those dollars, the government must first take that money out of the economy, through taxes or borrowing.

“So for every dollar the government spent, someone in the private sector didn't have that dollar available to spend,” writes Curtis Dubay, a senior policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation.

And if, in fact, the stimulus was such a stunning success, then why does Team Obama insist on extending jobless benefits to the point of absurdity — for up to 99 weeks?

Somewhere, we're sure, the select beneficiaries of government's last stimulus must be smiling.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. So, where’s the I-70 ‘Welcome to Pennsylvania’ sign on the Pa.-W.Va. border?
  2. The Fiat Chrysler mess: Government’s virus
  3. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  4. The Export-Import Bank: The Senate’s shame
  5. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  6. At the VA: The waiting dead
  7. Mon-Yough Tuesday takes
  8. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  9. Saturday essay: Dog days bark
  10. Sunday pops
  11. The Box