Bald eagles' return: A majestic success story
A young bald eagle in Armstrong County.
Photo by Louis B. Ruediger
The return of the bald eagle to Western Pennsylvania is a success story of majestic proportion.
In 1980, our national bird had almost disappeared from the state — there were only three pairs of nesting eagles accounted for that year. The number of nesting eagles in the state today well exceeds 200, thanks to a reintroduction program instituted by the sate Game Commission in 1983. Nesting pairs now are found in both Allegheny and Armstrong counties.
Drive out to Crooked Creek Park in Armstrong County on any given day, and it's likely you can track down juvenile baldies — not yet sporting the signature white heads that maturity will bring — overlooking the landscape from their perch on the bare branches of a dead evergreen tree. It's quite a sight.
Every year Trib Total Media reporters write stories that track the lives of eagles in our region, noting when the eggs come and when the newest eagles break out of their shells and enter the world as the latest numbers to add to the ledger of success. We monitor them as if they were our own children — smiling with joy at the prospect of new life, holding our breath when predators threaten that prospective life.
The return of the eagles is a good news story in a world where less happy news often dominates. We are grateful to the folks at the Game Commission who recognized a problem and took steps to solve it so many decades ago. It was that foresight then that makes it possible now to write the good news story about the return of the eagles.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.