Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
Laurel (with a reservation): To Springdale Mayor Ken Lloyd. In an effort to garner public opinion on the troubled borough, Lloyd held a “mayor's meeting” on Saturday. He got an earful. Lloyd's not a one-man rescue squad and he'll need help from the citizens — and his recalcitrant council. Too bad Lloyd, who took office only in January, spent the first two-plus months of his term in Florida, not Springdale.
Lance: To Management Science Associates. The data and technology company has a pending sales agreement for the Rock Airport and Business Park in West Deer. Opponents of the sale say the company plans to close the airport. When asked about it, Management Science declined comment. Its silence speaks loudly. The airport/business park hasn't reached its potential, but closing it certainly doesn't serve economic development in the Allegheny Valley — not to mention the more than $12 million in public money spent on its runway.
Lance: To Cheswick officials. Former councilman Brian Harvanek was punished for running afoul of ethics laws by voting on bills that paid his auto repair business for work on borough vehicles. But his fellow council members and other borough officials knew about the situation, yet still used the business and did nothing to stop Harvanek. At best this is ignorance of ethics laws. At worst, it's just ignoring them.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- An ObamaCare ‘re-do’?
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The Moody’s downgrade: Inaction’s price
- The federal budget: Here we go again
- The flood of illegals: Misplaced blame
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes