| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Denuding American power: Misguided missile cuts

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Friday, March 28, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

If the Obama administration has its way regarding two time-tested naval missiles, U.S. warships might as well run up white flags.

For fiscal year 2015, the administration would cut the Tomahawk program, which produces one of the world's most advanced cruise missiles, by $128 million and, for fiscal 2016, eliminate it. Tomahawk acquisitions would be cut by nearly half, to 100, in 2015 — and to zero in 2016, virtually ensuring depletion of the Navy's Tomahawk stock by around 2018, budget documents show.

The Navy also would have to stop acquiring Hellfire missiles in 2015. And all this is proposed despite the critical roles these missiles have played in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and the Balkans — and despite their proven, continuing capacity to deter aggression and project U.S. power abroad.

The administration wants to shift funding to the still-experimental Long Range Anti Ship Missile, which The Washington Free Beacon says “has underperformed when tested” and run up “extremely expensive development costs” — and which experts say is as least 10 years away from battle readiness.

Seth Cropsey, director of the Hudson Institute's Center for American Seapower, says the decision “really moves the U.S. away from a position of influence and military dominance.”

No doubt North Korea, China and Iran gleefully anticipate a U.S. Navy deprived of credible missile capabilities — as do terrorists seeking to cripple the global economy, which depends on our Navy to guarantee free sea access worldwide. Congress cannot allow the Obama administration to further weaken America's defenses.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. So, where’s the I-70 ‘Welcome to Pennsylvania’ sign on the Pa.-W.Va. border?
  2. Regional growth
  3. The Fiat Chrysler mess: Government’s virus
  4. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  5. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  6. The Export-Import Bank: The Senate’s shame
  7. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  8. At the VA: The waiting dead
  9. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  10. Sewage rate issues
  11. Connellsville police seek help in crime crackdown