ShareThis Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, April 19, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Attorney General Eric Holder is urging Congress to authorize $15 million for training state and local law officers to confront “active shooters.” And police academy training is for what again? ... Gawker reports that Paul Krugman, the economist turned New York Times pimp-in-chief for “income equality,” will be paid $250,000 over two semesters to “play a modest role in ... public events” at City University of New York and “contribute to the build-up” of CUNY's new “inequality initiative.” The deal does not involve teaching or supervising students. If Mr. Krugman is sincere in his convictions, we can expect him to spread his wealth around in no time flat, right? ... The Russians continue to flout nuclear arms agreements with the United States. The latest is Monday's testing of a new multi-warhead intercontinental missile, reports Bill Gertz of The Washington Free Beacon. The START treaty prohibits increasing the declared number of warheads. At the same time, The Weekly Standard reports that the Obama administration is considering a Russian request to upgrade electronic intelligence gathering sensors used on aircraft that would overfly the United States as part of the Open Skies Treaty. The administration must be mad (not as in angry but as in nuts). ... Noted conservative author F. Reid Buckley (brother of William F. Buckley) died last week at the age of 83. Once said the straight shooter: “I despise the ‘lit'rary' life. I avoid New York. I like to be with my family on my farm.” Wouldn't we all.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.