All taken seriously
Credit police and school officials for making an arrest within a week of a teen believed to have made three bomb threats recently at Ford City Junior-Senior High School.
Bomb threats are a conundrum for officials. They have to be taken seriously, even though they most often end up being nothing more than threats.
In truth, bombers — except maybe on police dramas on television — rarely announce their intentions. That would be counterintuitive to their goals. The Boston Marathon bombers didn't leave a note warning of the terror to come. Terrorists want to hurt and kill, not scare. And they don't want to fail. Warning people of impending danger would compromise their objective.
No bombs were found at Ford City or West Shamokin Junior-Senior High School, where another threat recently was made. Empirical evidence suggested there was overwhelming odds that would be the case. But you can't gamble when it comes to the lives of students and faculty after a threat is made. Schools have to be evacuated and searched for a bomb. The school day has to be disrupted.
The arrest of a suspect in Ford City and the penalties she faces should serve notice to others that bomb threats are a serious matter. They are not a harmless way to get out of classes for a day. They are not a good way to get back at school officials for a perceived wrong suffered. The fact is a bomb threat is a felony.
We thank police and school officials for their speedy actions to bring this fact to the forefront.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The revolving door: Washington’s ‘gift’
- U.N. Watch: Another jaded ‘inquiry’
- Expanding Medicaid: Gov.-elect Wolf embraces a false premise
- Sunday pops
- Pension reform should not be linked to a natural gas extraction tax
- The regulatory state: EPA picks a fight
- The Thursday wrap
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- An NLRB ambush
- Holiday Gift Club: The spirit of the season