Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
Lance: To the Ford City Council. Due to the council's utter incompetence and petty infighting over the water plant, the borough now owes the state more $21,000 in fines, a figure that grows by $250 every day. Four years of “planning” have resulted in squat. On our list if shameful local government failures, this is at the very top.
On the “Watch List”:
• Unnecessary disputes. The Diamond Club, which raised money for the Highlands High School baseball program, is having a disagreement with the district. The club is miffed because the district ended an exclusive-use lease for district ball fields. Now the club wants to give the equipment it bought to Harrison and Fawn townships. The district says it owns the equipment. Hmm, we thought it was “all about the kids.”
• The Mogie's Tavern “noise” problem: The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board held a hearing Wednesday to examine complaints about noise from live bands playing on the Lower Burrell nightspot's outdoor deck during the summer. Not one resident showed up to oppose the tavern. This was a problem requiring a hearing? The LCB will issue a ruling next month, but Mogie's owner Dave McGill may want to shut down the bands earlier than the current 1 a.m.
• The Springdale Library Tax. The 0.25-mill tax isn't onerous — the average homeowner will pay $21-26 more in taxes — and it will certainly help a facility that does the community a lot of good. We're glad the voters get to decide.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.