Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Pork Chop sentences: Five of the 16 people indicted in the state's Operation Pork Chop gambling sting in the McKeesport area have been given probation for their guilty pleas. Charges were lodged last September in the illegal gambling probe in which 354 video gambling machines were seized along with more than $1 million in cash. It's a classic example of the hypocrisy of government which itself sanctions gambling — but only if it gets to skim proceeds off the top.
Is this a “conflict”? Yes, Allegheny County Councilman Nick Futules receives royalties from a natural gas well on property he shares with his brother in Penn Hills. And, yes, the Oakmont Democrat, who chairs the council's parks committee, is involved in discussion whether to allow the same company to drill under Deer Lakes Park. But Mr. Futules long ago disclosed his drilling deal and will not profit from any county deal. It's hard to see how there's any actual conflict, let alone a perceived one.
Check it out: The boating season is here. And with Allegheny County having among the highest number of watercraft registrations of any county in the country, safety is a paramount concern. To that end, civilian volunteers from the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary will offer a Vessel Safety Check program this Saturday and Sunday at the Moon Township Municipal Building. It's a great way to have safety issues identified — and the opportunity to fix them — before being cited, stranded or even injured on the water.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.