| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The IRS scandal: The gun smokes

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Monday, April 21, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Were they simply discussions of procedural matters in advance of prospective legal action against bona fide rules violations? Or are those discussions evidence of a federal conspiracy hatched by Democrats to silence conservative critics?

Shockingly, emails obtained by Judicial Watch more than suggest the latter and that the gun smokes.

The Internal Revenue Service first attempted to silence conservative groups by slow-walking or outright sitting on their applications for tax-exempt nonprofit status. Invocations of the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination raised that red flag high with Lois Lerner, once the chief of the IRS's nonprofit division.

But now come emails obtained by the watchdog group showing an attempt to coordinate the selective harassment of conservative groups, based on a legally thin claim that they had lied on their applications. The idea appears to have had its genesis with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., but was entertained by the IRS, the Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission.

The feds considered prosecuting groups based not on any real violations of the law but on their political persuasions.

“These new emails show that the day before she broke the news of the IRS scandal, Lois Lerner was talking to a top Obama Justice Department official about whether the DOJ could prosecute the very same organizations that the IRS had already improperly targeted,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

No one can doubt any longer that this case requires a special prosecutor.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Keep asking questions
  2. The Thursday wrap
  3. How to counter Putin in Syria
  4. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  5. The language of America: Tongue of success
  6. Sunday pops
  7. Fire prevention: Service & honor
  8. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  9. Liquidate the Export-Import Bank
  10. Threatening climate debate
  11. Saturday essay: Perpetual peppers