Share This Page

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, April 24, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

On the “Watch List”:

• The Excela Westmoreland Hospital “connection.” A Youngwood woman allegedly sold suspected heroin while s he was a patient — even when she was in the hospital's intensive care unit. Police said they found more than 300 stamp bags worth $3,800 in her hospital room. A review is in order to ensure that the only drugs leaving Excela's hospitals are its own.

• Pittsburgh's bid for the Democratic National Convention. Many of those waxing poetic about possibly hosting the 2016 coronation cite the city's “successful” hosting of the Group of 20 economic summit in 2009. Excuse us, but that was a public relations nightmare for the city, what with all the anarchists' protests beamed around the world. And Pittsburgh merchants suffered great economic harm in the name of “security.”

Laurel: To neighbors keeping watch. It's encouraging that 30 Latrobe residents turned out for the first meeting of a revamped neighborhood watch program. This is about working with police, not vigilantism. Here's hoping that distinction is clear.

Congratulations: To Brian Jones. As interim director of Westmoreland County's Department of Public Safety and a finalist for the agency's top job, Mr. Jones clinched the position after the department's fine response to a student's stabbing rampage at Franklin Regional Senior High School. Clearly Mr. Jones got the director's job the old-fashioned way: He earned it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.