Armstrong K-9 in need: Support Officer Klif
The only four-legged officer in Armstrong County's K-9 unit has been benched with an injury and will need costly treatment before he can get back in the game. The District Attorney's Office, which employs Officer Klif and his handler, is looking to the public for donations to cover the medical bill, which is projected to exceed $5,000.
Klif has a bad disc in his back that needs to be fixed. He can't do his job if he's in pain and can't walk.
When the DA's office got Klif six years ago with a grant from the Department of Homeland Security, it agreed to pay for the care of the German shepherd that sniffs for bombs and drugs when on patrol in the county and region. Such a commitment is pretty standard for any responsible pet owner. If you don't have the money to feed, shelter, pay for shots or medical treatment, you shouldn't be a pet owner.
It is, however, a sad fact that the poor economic state of the county makes it unable to fully honor its commitment to Klif — that it cannot come up with $5,000 to make good on the promise it made when it got the dog.
The public needs to support this valuable member of our law-enforcement team with donations to get him off the injured reserve list.
You can donate to the Armstrong County DA K9 Fund at any Farmers & Merchants Bank branch. Countians may not be the ones who signed on to take care of Officer Klif, but he works for all of us — and he deserves our support.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The IRS scandal: Do the Lois Lerner emails still exist?
- The Thursday wrap
- The ‘Truthy’ project: We are suspect
- Revolving doors: Self-protection
- Another Corbett administration scandal? ‘Delete’ & ‘cleanse’ at the Education Department