Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Those struggling Bucs: Perhaps a change of leagues will do the Pirates some good. The Bucs open a two-game series Tuesday in Baltimore against the American League's Orioles. Pittsburgh, the darling of the baseball world last season, can't seem to fire on many cylinders this year, now sitting in fourth place in the National League Central, 8½ games out of first and with one of the worst records in Major League Baseball. Time to dust off all those old Green Weenies.
Leger returns: Former Pittsburgh Finance Director Paul Leger has been nominated by Mayor Bill Peduto to take on that role again. Mr. Leger, 69, is credited with writing the Allegheny County Home Rule Charter and was one of the guiding forces behind PGH 21, a task force that sought to remake city finances a decade ago. He's regarded well by Democrats and Republicans and certainly has his work cut out for him. We wish him the best in a thankless job.
Shill now, pay later: The Toledo, Ohio, Block Bugler thinks it would be a dandy idea for Pittsburgh to host the Democratic National Convention in 2016. It admits that “a key to putting together an enticing package will be figuring how to pay” for it all but, hey, right now “more enthusiasm and less anxiety seems appropriate.” Indeed, the Bugler admonishes that “city taxpayers can't be expected to fund a political convention.” But the truth of the matter is that taxpayers always get stuck with the bill, one way or another.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.