Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Laurel: To Steve Zappala. The Allegheny County district attorney's program to educate local police departments in how to deal with autistic people is a gem. For the untrained, it can be sadly too easy to assume an autistic person is being unresponsive, as in uncooperative. And that can lead to misunderstandings with unintended bad consequences in police matters. Kudos to a most worthy effort.
On to Round 2: The Pittsburgh Penguins host the New York Rangers on Friday night in the first game of the second round of the Stanley Cup playoffs. The Pens are more rested, having advanced over Columbus on Monday night. But the Rangers could be more in their groove, having just eliminated Philadelphia on Wednesday evening. The teams split four regular season games this year. Hey! and all that.
On the “Watch List”: UPMC's succession plan. The guessing game has begun anew over who might someday succeed Jeff Romoff as CEO of the health giant. That, after Liz Concordia, thought to be his heir apparent, announced she's leaving for the top job at the University of Colorado Health System. You'll recall that long-ago heir apparent John Paul now heads the competing Allegheny Health Network. Stay tuned.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.