Saturday essay: The garden grows
Change is easy to find in the garden, especially after a week of rain magically altered its complexion.
The soil in the raised beds, tilled to plumpness as they were amended with rich organics, has settled in for the long growing season ahead. And what with the number of peas dotting the surface, it's readily apparent that somebody forgot to soak them before planting. Pushed back into the dirt, they'll sprout, eagerly, in days.
Greenhouse cabbage and cauliflower, transplanted just a week ago, suddenly are greener and taller. No fertilizer and no number of worms can match the shot in the roots that comes with each drop of nitrogen-rich rainwater.
Radishes, newly bedded as well, cowered in the week's steady rain. But they're shaking off their soil-bespotted young leaves and now are well on their way to a first harvest by Memorial Day.
A long-range spring forecast that, a month ago, made most gardeners cringe for its predicted cold, suddenly looks far warmer and brighter. Looks like a switch to bolt-resistant lettuce will be in order for the raised beds. And there's really no reason to delay sowing the green beans or transplanting the greenhouse cucumbers into their respective beds.
As tempting as it is, the tomatoes won't be transplanted until mid-month. It's not so much the threat of a late frost but waiting for a drier spell and steady overnight temperatures no lower than 50 to ward off the kind of blight that was so devastating last year.
But as some rationalizing gardener once put it, there are no gardening mistakes, only experiments.
— Colin McNickle
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.