The Pennsylvania Supreme Court booted Ardmore businessman Bob Guzzardi from May's Republican gubernatorial primary ballot for doing what a Department of State employee said he could do — namely, not meet a deadline for filing his financial disclosure form. Inquiring minds want to know if that employee is a Tom Corbett supporter. ... Under the new Pennsylvania law that allows small games of chance in local taverns, bar owners get to keep only 35 percent of the proceeds. Local governments get 5 percent. But state government's take is 60 percent. Isn't that an organized government racket? ... Democrats are pushing for a constitutional amendment giving Congress the power to impose the kind of campaign finance limits already ruled as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Attempting to amend the Constitution to restrict a right is un-American. ... Democrats once again are railing at Republicans for blocking their attempt to raise the minimum wage. The word “racists” even has been thrown around. But as black economics scholar Thomas Sowell reminds, the original intent of wage floors decades ago was to protect labor unions and price minorities out of the job market. Democrats really are Dimmycrats. ... Heisman Trophy winner Jameis Winston calls his leaving a Florida grocery store without paying for $33 worth of crawfish and crab legs a moment of “youthful ignorance.” Oh, so that's the euphemism these days for stealing, theft and petty larceny, eh?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.