Another U.N. crock: Warped reality
In yet another pathetic example of the United Nations' disregard of human rights and dignity, Iran easily won seats on five subcommittees of the U.N. Economic and Social Council, including the Commission on the Status of Women.
That's right. Apparently the arbiters of Iran's worthiness for membership missed the report just days before regarding one of Iran's senior clerics, who decreed that women who dress immodestly cause earthquakes, according to Townhall.com.
Then again, Iran doesn't discriminate only against women; it disregards all basic human rights.
Yet without a single challenge, Iran won a four-year seat on a commission that's supposedly dedicated to gender equality, despite a letter condemning Iran's candidacy signed by several women's groups.
Confronting this latest episode in an unending series of U.N. insults, U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power minced no words: Iran's membership, she said, “is a particularly troubling outcome.” Do say!
Of course, appointing Iran as a defender of women's rights is no more ludicrous than China, Cuba and Saudi Arabia, among like-minded nations, serving on the U.N.'s contemptible Human Rights Council.
What's most “troubling” is that the U.S. condones this continuing farce by paying almost a quarter of Turtle Bay's operating budget. That cost, along with the erosion of U.S. credibility, is too much to tolerate.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The Arneson firing: Legally dubious
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- The theft epidemic: Simple safeguards
- The Box
- The Obama foreign policy ‘model’ imperils the world.
- Piercing the media’s shield: Muzzles & slopes