ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, May 7, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Attorney General Eric Holder, pursuing criminal investigations of financial institutions, says no company is “too big to jail.” We would remind Mr. Holder that neither are attorneys general — found in contempt of Congress and repeatedly flouting the rule of law. ... Fairfax, Va., is proposing an ordinance that would limit “group assembly” at private homes to 49 people a day and not to take place more than three times in any 40-day period. Can you say “lawsuit,” class. Whatever happened to “the right of the people peaceably to assemble”? ... Not to be outdone in the Department of Government Pecans is Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman. The Democrat (of course) has introduced a bill to change the name of “Asian carp” to “invasive carp.” Why? Mr. Hoffman says referring to the fish as “Asian” is hurtful to some people. Hold on to your Chinese checkers, everybody, and don't you dare think about planting a European mountain ash. ... Even some liberals are assailing a plan proposed by Seattle Mayor Don Murray to mandate a minimum wage of $15 an hour. One of them, Slate business writer Jordan Weissman, says such a wage floor could have the unintended consequence of forcing businesses to flee the city. Which, of course, would kill jobs and, of course, damage Seattle's economy and, oh, yes, hurt minority workers the most. Other than that, it's a great idea, Mr. Mayor. Ahem. Command economics is so, so, so, what's the word we're searching for? Ah, yes, “progressive.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.