Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Lance: To broken trust. Fast on the heels of the Vatican announcing that it has sanctioned or defrocked more than 3,400 priests over the past decade for allegedly molesting children comes word of a major scandal for the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh — allegations that five clerics abused 12 students at the former North Catholic High School in the 1950s and '60s. How sad. How tragic. How sickening.
Lance: To Nick Futules. Allegheny County Council's vice president let the “F”-word fly not once but twice in the heat of this week's debate over the Deer Lakes Park drilling lease. And, no, the word wasn't “fracking.” The Democrat also walked out of the meeting, putting a finger to his head to make the “crazy” motion. It's classless behavior from a public official who should know better.
Lance: To Jane Orie. Released from prison in February after serving time for her public corruption conviction, the former state senator of McCandless now is attempting to rehabilitate her public image. Sayeth she, in an interview with WTAE: “I think politics is a dirty, dirty sport.” A jury of her peers said she resembles that remark.
On the “Watch List”: Barry Ford. The president of development for Continental Real Estate says his company is considering a multifamily housing development adjacent to PNC Park at the corner of Mazeroski Way and North Shore Drive. That's great. He also notes that a parking garage would be needed, intimating that the public should pay for it. That's not so great. Public officials say the well is dry. Build your own garage, Mr. Ford?
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.