Greensburg Laurels & Lances
On the “Watch List”: Westmoreland County's day reporting center. A Unity couple's lawsuit alleges that their son died of an overdose of heroin bought outside the South Maple Avenue probationary center in Greensburg. And the facility has been flagged in the past for illegal drug activity right under its nose. Authorities temporarily shut it down in 2011 after a raid netted the arrest of 23 people for selling drugs around this “treatment” center. What's alleged is more of the same. And that's inexcusable.
Lance: To Westmoreland County's judge shortage. It's not as if any of this comes as a surprise: The county bench is facing three judge retirements and may not get any relief until the 2015 elections. Four judges usually assigned to the criminal court will be reduced to two this summer. And the governor's office says there are no plans to temporarily fill the vacancies. So rather than address and fix a problem in plain sight, the course of action is to simply steer into it and hope for the best, eh?
Laurel: To Mr. and Mrs. Frank Szczerba Jr. The couple bought the West Newton Volunteer Fire Co. fire hall and adjoining Youghiogheny Ballroom and will allow the cash-strapped fire company, for a nominal fee, to continue using part of the building that houses its trucks and radio room. That's a big savings for the fire company. Unfortunately, such consideration toward firefighters tends to be the exception rather than the rule.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.