TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Public prayers: Freedom prevails

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Tuesday, May 6, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

Americans once again are more free to exercise their freedom of religion, thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The high court ruled Monday, and along the expected 5-4 conservative-liberal split, that ceremonial prayer indeed is permitted to open public government meetings and is not an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

The case came out of Greece, N.Y., where council meetings began with such an invocation. A Jewish resident and an atheist took umbrage, claiming that because only Christians tended to deliver the prayers, the Constitution's Establishment Clause was being violated. A federal district court sided with the town while a federal appeals court agreed with the plaintiffs.

But Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, not only noted that such prayers have been a part of this nation's public meetings since the Founding, he reminded that Greece offered clergy of all faiths — and even atheists — the opportunity to open the meetings. And the local government did not screen or otherwise control prayer content. Given the religious demographics of the upstate New York community, most of the prayers were Christian in nature.

But as Mr. Justice Kennedy noted, citing the practice of using appointed and visiting chaplains “to express themselves in a religious idiom” in opening sessions of Congress, “It acknowledges our growing diversity not by proscribing sectarian content but by welcoming ministers of many creeds.”

The court's bottom line, and one on which we all should reflect: “(G)overnment may not seek to define permissible categories of religious speech.”

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. North Korea’s nukes: Object lesson ignored
  2. U.N. Watch: Follow China’s lead?
  3. EPA diktats: Pushing back
  4. Sunday pops
  5. The Box
  6. Medicare @ 50: Sick, getting sicker
  7. Jamestown revealed: History comes alive
  8. Regional growth
  9. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  10. Kittanning Laurels & Lances
  11. State of Corruption: The nature of politics